<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Blog &#187; FLSA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/tag/flsa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com</link>
	<description>A Look at Trends and Happenings in Labor Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>New FLSA Regulations Take Effect Today (May 5)</title>
		<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/05/new-flsa-regulations-take-effect-today-may-5/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/05/new-flsa-regulations-take-effect-today-may-5/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 May 2011 20:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary McCarty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum Wage Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tip pooling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tips]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/?p=1285</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) regulations incorporating amendments and clarifications from recent years take effect today, May 5, 2011. The new rules also concern tip pooling arrangements, which make clear that tips cannot be diverted from people receiving them unless a valid tip-pooling arrangement has been established and promulgated to participants. The regulations navigate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) regulations incorporating amendments and clarifications from recent years take effect today, May 5, 2011.</p>
<p>The new rules also concern tip pooling arrangements, which make clear that tips cannot be diverted from people receiving them unless a valid tip-pooling arrangement has been established and promulgated to participants. The regulations navigate a course between conflicting Department of Labor (DOL) and federal court opinions.</p>
<p>Confused about FLSA requirements? Get a copy of Personnel Concepts&#39; <a href="http://www.personnelconcepts.com/human-resource-tools/flsa-program/">FLSA Compliance Program</a>, and end that confusion today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/05/new-flsa-regulations-take-effect-today-may-5/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Its First Test, DOL&#8217;s Internship Standard Loses in Court</title>
		<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/05/in-its-first-test-dols-internship-standard-loses-in-court/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/05/in-its-first-test-dols-internship-standard-loses-in-court/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2011 19:44:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary McCarty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[DOL]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/?p=1282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Calling the Department of Labor&#39;s Fact Sheet #71&#8212;&#34;Internship Programs Under the Fair Labor Standards Act&#34;&#8212;&#34;a poor method&#34; and &#34;overly rigid and inconsistent,&#34; the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of a for-profit nursing home that relied in part on interns to run its operations. The Labor Department issued a six-factor test to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Calling the Department of Labor&#39;s Fact Sheet #71&mdash;&quot;Internship Programs Under the Fair Labor Standards Act&quot;&mdash;&quot;a poor method&quot; and &quot;overly rigid and inconsistent,&quot; the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled in favor of a for-profit nursing home that relied in part on interns to run its operations.</p>
<p>The Labor Department issued a six-factor test to determine internship status to great fanfare a year ago and announced that it would be cracking down on businesses that misclassified as interns people who were otherwise doing work that should be compensated.</p>
<p>In <em>Solis v. Laurelbook Sanitarium and School, Inc.</em>, the DOL&#39;s litmus test was rejected by the justices, who wrote:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>[W]e hold that the proper approach for determining whether an employment relationship exists in the context of a training or learning situation is to ascertain which party derives the primary benefit from the relationship. Factors such as whether the relationship displaces paid employees and whether there is educational value derived from the relationship are relevant considerations that can guide the inquiry.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Of course, this is no indication that other courts won&#39;t side with the DOL, but in the 6th Circuit at least, a new standard has been set.</p>
<p>To better understand and comply with overtime, internship and general wage and employment standards, Personnel Concepts offers its powerful but easy-to-use <a href="http://www.personnelconcepts.com/human-resource-tools/flsa-program/">FLSA Compliance Program</a> that comes with both a manual and a CD-ROM. Get yours today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/05/in-its-first-test-dols-internship-standard-loses-in-court/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SCOTUS Rules Oral Complaints as Valid as Written Ones</title>
		<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/03/scotus-rules-oral-complaints-as-valid-as-written-ones/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/03/scotus-rules-oral-complaints-as-valid-as-written-ones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 20:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary McCarty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anti-retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/?p=1255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court today (March 22, 2011) overturned the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals&#39; ruling that, to be valid, complaints under the anti-retaliation provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) must be in writing. In Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics, the justices rejected what they termed a &#34;narrow interpretation&#34; of language in the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Supreme Court today (March 22, 2011) overturned the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals&#39; ruling that, to be valid, complaints under the anti-retaliation provision of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) must be in writing.</p>
<p>In <em>Kasten v. Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics</em>, the justices rejected what they termed a &quot;narrow interpretation&quot; of language in the FLSA and threw open the statute&#39;s protection to oral complaints as well as written ones. Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas dissented.</p>
<p>The &quot;narrow interpretation&quot; refers to the passage in the FLSA that forbids an employer to &ldquo;discharge or in any other manner discriminate against any employee because such employee has&nbsp;filed any complaint.&rdquo;&nbsp;Much of the arguing back and forth hinged on the definition of &quot;filed.&quot;</p>
<p>Asking a rhetorical question, the majority opinion reached this game-changing conclusion:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Why would Congress want to limit the enforcement scheme&rsquo;s effectiveness by inhibiting use of the Act&rsquo;s complaint procedure by those who would &nbsp;find it difficult to reduce their&nbsp;complaints to writing, particularly the illiterate, &nbsp;less &nbsp;educated, or&nbsp;overworked workers who were most in need of the Act&rsquo;s help at the&nbsp;time of passage? &nbsp;Limiting the provision&rsquo;s scope to written complaints&nbsp;could prevent Government agencies &nbsp;from using hotlines, interviews,&nbsp;and other oral methods to &nbsp;receive complaints.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Employers, take an active role in upholding the provisions of the landmark FLSA while keeping your employees informed of their rights and obligations. Order a copy of Personnel Concepts&#39; best-selling <a href="http://www.personnelconcepts.com/labor-law-posters/FLSA-compliance-poster/">All-On-One FLSA Compliance Poster</a> today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/03/scotus-rules-oral-complaints-as-valid-as-written-ones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Courts Disagree on Overtime Status of Pharma Representatives</title>
		<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/02/courts-disagree-on-overtime-status-of-pharma-representatives/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/02/courts-disagree-on-overtime-status-of-pharma-representatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary McCarty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pharmaceutical representatives]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/?p=1235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The U.S. Supreme Court may end up deciding the issue, but for now one circuit court is saying yea and another nay to whether pharmaceutical sales representatives are eligible for overtime pay. The issue centers on the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) exemption from overtime rules for those employees who are engaged in outside sales. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The U.S. Supreme Court may end up deciding the issue, but for now one circuit court is saying yea and another nay to whether pharmaceutical sales representatives are eligible for overtime pay.</p>
<p>The issue centers on the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) exemption from overtime rules for those employees who are engaged in outside sales.</p>
<p>Pharma reps and their attorneys argue that what the representatives do in the field is not selling but conducting public relations meetings and handing out samples of drugs. Big Pharma, obviously, rejects this costly argument, so the two sides have met in court on various occasions.</p>
<p>The most recent decision came this past Monday (Feb. 14, 2011) when the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit ruled that pharmaceutical representatives are indeed exempt from overtime rules, arguing that:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;The pharmaceutical industry&#39;s representatives&mdash;detail men and women&mdash;share many more similarities than differences with their colleagues in other&nbsp;sales fields, and we hold that they are exempt from the [FLSA] overtime-pay requirement.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Earlier, the 2nd Circuit Court had ruled that the reps are not exempt and are due overtime pay.&nbsp;</p>
<p>In both decisions, the Department of Labor (DOL), overseer of the FLSA, submitted amicus briefs contending that pharmaceutical representatives are indeed eligible for overtime pay.</p>
<p>The issue would now appear to be moving for a SCOTUS review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/02/courts-disagree-on-overtime-status-of-pharma-representatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOL Collects $300 Million in Back Wages in New Enforcement Push</title>
		<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/12/dol-collects-300-million-in-back-wages-in-new-enforcement-push/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/12/dol-collects-300-million-in-back-wages-in-new-enforcement-push/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Dec 2010 12:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary McCarty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum Wage Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime pay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/?p=1121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Labor (DOL) announced recently that it has collected more than $300 million in back wages since 2009, benefiting some 385,000 workers. Typically, back wages represent overtime pay that was withheld either knowingly or unknowingly. Since taking over, the Obama administration and DOL&#160;Secretary Hilda Solis have beefed up their inspection force by hiring [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Labor (DOL) announced recently that it has collected more than $300 million in back wages since 2009, benefiting some 385,000 workers.</p>
<p>Typically, back wages represent overtime pay that was withheld either knowingly or unknowingly. Since taking over, the Obama administration and DOL&nbsp;Secretary Hilda Solis have beefed up their inspection force by hiring some 300 additional Wage and Hour (WHD) Division agents. The DOL has also launched an outreach program called &quot;We Can Help,&quot; which provides a hotline for workers to report wage abuse.</p>
<p>&quot;Protecting worker rights is my top priority,&quot;&nbsp;Solis said upon announcing the monetary coup.</p>
<p>Overtime is codified in the landmark Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 and has been further defined by Congress throughout the decades.</p>
<p>Get a copy today of Personnel Concepts&#8217; <a href="http://www.personnelconcepts.com/human-resource-tools/flsa-overtime-rules-compliance-kit/">FLSA&nbsp;Overtime Rules Compliance Kit</a> and stay in tune with all federal wage laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/12/dol-collects-300-million-in-back-wages-in-new-enforcement-push/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Child Labor Regulations Take Effect Monday, July 19</title>
		<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/07/new-child-labor-regulations-take-effect-monday-july-19/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/07/new-child-labor-regulations-take-effect-monday-july-19/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 15:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary McCarty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum Wage Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personnel Concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child labor laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/?p=966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Labor (DOL) recently updated its regulations regarding child labor in the U.S.&#8212;calling them &#34;the most ambitious and far-reaching revisions&#34; in the past 30 years&#8212;and these new regs are set to go into effect this coming Monday, July 19, 2010. The updated regulations effect a variety of changes to how DOL will interpret [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Labor (DOL) recently updated its regulations regarding child labor in the U.S.&mdash;calling them &quot;the most ambitious and far-reaching revisions&quot; in the past 30 years&mdash;and these new regs are set to go into effect this coming Monday, July 19, 2010.</p>
<p>The updated regulations effect a variety of changes to how DOL will interpret the child labor provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).&nbsp;</p>
<p>Perhaps the most significant among these changes is the lifting of a decades-old restriction that limited the industries in which 14- and 15-year-olds were permitted to work.</p>
<p>Now, instead of being allowed to work only in retail, food service and gasoline service establishments, young workers may work in other environments such as state and local governments, banks, insurance companies, advertising agencies and information technology firms.</p>
<p>The new regs also increase penalties for violations, especially regarding the injury of death of a teenage worker, and create a new work-study regimen.</p>
<p>Child labor laws and regulations are covered briefly in the mandatory federal minimum wage poster, which is included on all Personnel Concepts <a href="http://www.personnelconcepts.com/labor-law-posters/state-federal-labor-law-posters/">Space Saver-1 All-On-One State and Federal Labor Law Posters</a>.</p>
<p>Personnel Concepts is closely monitoring developments at the DOL regarding the minimum wage panel and will alert clients when and if any posting requirements change.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/07/new-child-labor-regulations-take-effect-monday-july-19/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOL Cracks Down on Illegal Employment of Youths</title>
		<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/06/dol-cracks-down-on-illegal-employment-of-youths/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/06/dol-cracks-down-on-illegal-employment-of-youths/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary McCarty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personnel Concepts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[child labor laws]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/?p=924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Labor (DOL) has announced stiffer penalties for violation of the child labor laws covered under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and other pieces of legislation.&#160; &#34;Beginning today, employers who hire children too young to work will face stiffer penalties,&#34; said Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis. &#34;Work is not child&#8217;s play. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Labor (DOL) has announced stiffer penalties for violation of the child labor laws covered under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) and other pieces of legislation.&nbsp;</p>
<p>&quot;Beginning today, employers who hire children too young to work will face stiffer penalties,&quot; said Secretary of Labor Hilda L. Solis. &quot;Work is not child&#8217;s play. When children do work, that work must be age appropriate, safe and positive, and, it must not interfere with their schooling.&quot;</p>
<p>Under the Labor Department&#8217;s new, tougher penalty structure, employers who illegally employ individuals ages 12 or 13 will face a penalty of at least $6,000 per violation. If a worker is under 12 years of age and illegally employed, the penalty will be at least $8,000. Penalties for illegally employing workers under age 14 could be raised to $11,000 under certain conditions.</p>
<p>&quot;These increased fines, coupled with important recent revisions to the child labor rules and reinvigorated enforcement by the Wage and Hour Division, will help ensure the safety of children,&quot; added Secretary Solis.</p>
<p>Child labor laws are part of the mandatory postings that employers are required to display for their employees. Personnel Concept&#8217;s <a href="http://www.personnelconcepts.com/labor-law-posters/state-federal-labor-law-posters/">Space Saver-1 All-On-One State and Federal Labor Law Posters</a> will meet this requirement for your business.&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/06/dol-cracks-down-on-illegal-employment-of-youths/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reclassifying Employees as Non-Exempt a Proven Red Flag</title>
		<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/05/reclassifying-employees-as-non-exempt-a-proven-red-flag/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/05/reclassifying-employees-as-non-exempt-a-proven-red-flag/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 15:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary McCarty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum Wage Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exempt employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-exempt employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime pay]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/?p=879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you find yourself reclassifying your employees as non-exempt (from previously being exempt), then you could end up in deep legal doo-doo like the Michigan Bell Telephone Company. Reason? It doesn&#8217;t take employees long to figure out that, if they&#8217;re doing the same jobs as exempt as when they were non-exempt, then they were probably [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you find yourself reclassifying your employees as non-exempt (from previously being exempt), then you could end up in deep legal doo-doo like the Michigan Bell Telephone Company.</p>
<p>Reason? It doesn&#8217;t take employees long to figure out that, if they&#8217;re doing the same jobs as exempt as when they were non-exempt, then they were probably cheated out of overtime prior to the reclassification.</p>
<p>Voila&#8211;<em>Wlotkowski et al. v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company</em>, filed in the Eastern District of Michigan.</p>
<p>Now, Michigan Bell probably did the right thing in realizing the class-action-lawsuit workers were non-exempt, but when it did so, it should also have dealt with the back-overtime-pay issue. Since the company decided to brush that under the rug, it ended up being sued.</p>
<p>There are a couple of lessons here. One is that it&#8217;s important to do workforce classification audits, especially with the Department of Labor breathing down employers&#8217; throats to classify (and pay) properly. The other is that, when you do reclassify employees as non-exempt, you must right away square the back-pay issue with them.</p>
<p>Classifying workers is often difficult, but Personnel Concepts offers an <a href="http://www.personnelconcepts.com/human-resource-tools/flsa-overtime-rules-compliance-kit/">FLSA Overtime Rules Compliance Kit</a>, which will explain the criteria for exempt and non-exempt classifications and even provide handy checklist forms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/05/reclassifying-employees-as-non-exempt-a-proven-red-flag/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DOL Mulls New Approach to Compliance</title>
		<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/05/dol-mulls-new-approach-to-compliance/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/05/dol-mulls-new-approach-to-compliance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 19:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary McCarty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exempt employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[non-exempt employees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[overtime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/?p=877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Department of Labor (DOL), in issuing an updated regulatory agenda this past week, announced it was considering a major change in its approach to enforcement. Instead of letting businesses play what it called a &#34;catch me if you can&#34; game, the DOL said it will issue regulations requiring each company to develop and implement [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Department of Labor (DOL), in issuing an updated regulatory agenda this past week, announced it was considering a major change in its approach to enforcement. Instead of letting businesses play what it called a &quot;catch me if you can&quot; game, the DOL said it will issue regulations requiring each company to develop and implement its own compliance plan.</p>
<p>In essence, this would require companies to find, fix and prevent workplace problems before they happen.</p>
<p>Another part of this strategy would call for businesses to issue documents to workers stating and justifying their job classifications&#8211;exempt, non-exempt or independent contractor&#8211;and then keep a copy of these documents on file for DOL inspectors.</p>
<p>We already knew through previous DOL announcements that the agency was targeting abuse of job classifications, resulting in underpayment or even non-payment to employees. This latest announcement seems to take matters a step further.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ll keep tracking this development, but it will probably take months for the DOL to write the necessary regulations and then hold a public commentary period on them. Still, it&#8217;s a good idea to check how your classify your employees (and interns if you have any).</p>
<p>A good source for understanding the difference between exempt and non-exempt employees is Personnel Concepts<a href="http://www.personnelconcepts.com/human-resource-tools/flsa-overtime-rules-compliance-kit/"> FLSA Overtime Rules Compliance Kit</a>. Get yours today, for the DOL will catch you if it can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/05/dol-mulls-new-approach-to-compliance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Adopts Federal Standard on Unpaid Interns</title>
		<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/04/california-adopts-federal-standard-on-unpaid-interns/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/04/california-adopts-federal-standard-on-unpaid-interns/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:51:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary McCarty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Minimum Wage Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[State Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FLSA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unpaid interns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/?p=860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) had long made life complicated for employers in the state who wanted to bring on board unpaid interns, adding an extra five criteria to those spelled out in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). But all that has changed now that the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The California Division of Labor Standards Enforcement (DLSE) had long made life complicated for employers in the state who wanted to bring on board unpaid interns, adding an extra five criteria to those spelled out in the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).</p>
<p>But all that has changed now that the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has launched a crackdown on using unpaid interns as unpaid employees. The Division announced recently, in an opinion letter, that it would henceforth use only the six federal criteria, which are:&nbsp;</p>
<p>►The interns&#8217; training, even though it includes actual operation of the employer&#8217;s facilities, is similar to that given in a vocational school;<br />
►The interns&#8217; training is for the interns&#8217; benefit;<br />
►The interns do not displace regular employees but work under their close supervision;<br />
►The employer does not derive an immediate advantage from the interns&#8217; activities and, on occasion, its operations may be actually impeded;<br />
►The interns are not necessarily entitled to a job when the training period ends;<br />
►The employer and the interns understand that the interns are not entitled to wages for the time spent in training.</p>
<p>For those of you who want to be sure you&#8217;re following the proper rules and regulations in classifying your employees, Personnel Concepts offers a comprehensive but easy-to-follow <a href="http://www.personnelconcepts.com/human-resource-tools/flsa-overtime-rules-compliance-kit/">FLSA Overtime Rules Compliance Kit</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/04/california-adopts-federal-standard-on-unpaid-interns/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

