<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PC Blog &#187; paid sick leave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/tag/paid-sick-leave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com</link>
	<description>A Look at Trends and Happenings in Labor Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 20:56:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Connecticut to Become First State With Paid Sick Leave Law</title>
		<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/05/connecticut-to-become-first-state-with-paid-sick-leave-law/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/05/connecticut-to-become-first-state-with-paid-sick-leave-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 16:24:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary McCarty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid sick leave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/?p=1299</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Connecticut Senate this week passed&#8212;and the governor is expected to sign&#8212;legislation mandating five annual days of sick leave for &#34;service workers,&#34; which is an extremely and confusing category according to legal experts who have examined the wording of the law. Interestingly, the bill exempts the YMCA and all manufacturers, but requires employers to determine [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Connecticut Senate this week passed&mdash;and the governor is expected to sign&mdash;legislation mandating five annual days of sick leave for &quot;service workers,&quot; which is an extremely and confusing category according to legal experts who have examined the wording of the law.</p>
<p>Interestingly, the bill exempts the YMCA and all manufacturers, but requires employers to determine on their own if their workers should be classified as &quot;service workers,&quot; using more than 50 &quot;broad or detailed occupation code numbers and titles as defined by the federal Bureau of Labor Statistics Standard Occupational Classification system.&quot;</p>
<p>Three municipalities&mdash;San Francisco, Washington, D.C. and <a href="http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/03/milwaukee-sick-leave-law-back-on-after-court-ruling/">Milwaukee</a>&nbsp;(after a long legal battle)&mdash;are currently the only governments with mandated sick leave laws, making Connecticut the first state to enact such a law.</p>
<p>When signed, the law will take effect on Jan. 1, 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/05/connecticut-to-become-first-state-with-paid-sick-leave-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Milwaukee Sick Leave Law Back On After Court Ruling</title>
		<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/03/milwaukee-sick-leave-law-back-on-after-court-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/03/milwaukee-sick-leave-law-back-on-after-court-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 13:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary McCarty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milwaukee paid sick leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid sick leave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/?p=1261</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In November 2008 voters in Milwaukee, Wisc., approved a landmark paid sick leave initiative for employees working within the city. A subsequent legal challenge by a local business association got the measure ruled unconstitutional on technical law-writing grounds. Then, just a week ago the Wisconsin Court of Appeals reversed the original court decision, placing the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In November 2008 voters in Milwaukee, Wisc., approved a landmark paid sick leave initiative for employees working within the city. A subsequent legal challenge by a local business association got the measure ruled unconstitutional on technical law-writing grounds. Then, just a week ago the Wisconsin Court of Appeals reversed the original court decision, placing the law back on the books.</p>
<p>The case in question&mdash;<em>Metro Milwaukee Association of Commerce v. City of Milwaukee</em>&mdash;was decided on March 24, lifting a two-year moratorium issued by the initial court ruling.</p>
<p>Milwaukee thus joins the cities of San Francisco and Washington, D.C., as the only municipalities (or other government body) legislating paid sick leave in the United States.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2011/03/milwaukee-sick-leave-law-back-on-after-court-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Maine Floats Paid Sick Leave Law, Businesses Recoil</title>
		<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/01/maine-floats-paid-sick-leave-law-businesses-recoil/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/01/maine-floats-paid-sick-leave-law-businesses-recoil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 19:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary McCarty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[State Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid sick leave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/?p=744</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First Congress proposed a paid sick leave policy for all the nation&#8217;s businesses, but that initiative seems to have stalled behind some minor issues like health care reform and carbon transfers. Now Maine is getting into the act, and the proposal has state businesspeople up in arms, especially those who run small businesses. The bill [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First Congress proposed a paid sick leave policy for all the nation&#8217;s businesses, but that initiative seems to have stalled behind some minor issues like health care reform and carbon transfers. Now Maine is getting into the act, and the proposal has state businesspeople up in arms, especially those who run small businesses.</p>
<p>The bill was introduced by State Senate President Elizabeth Mitchell, a Democrat who also happens to be running for governor.</p>
<p>Mitchell seems to be playing off the H1N1 influenza scare in proposing her legislation.</p>
<p>&quot;Spreading a disease by going to work because you can&#8217;t afford to stay home is not good for the employer, it&#8217;s not good for the public, and it&#8217;s not good, of course, for the employee,&quot; she says.</p>
<p>Business, large, medium and small, is crying foul.</p>
<p>&quot;An outsider, no matter how well intentioned he or she may be, does not have the means or adequate knowledge required to make a valid decision about a company&#8217;s day-to-day operations, nor are they in a position to decide what benefits a company must offer,&quot; Rod Wiles says. &quot;Suggesting that businesses can and should absorb additional labor costs at this time is ill-advised and irresponsible.&quot;</p>
<p>Wiles, of course, is a lobbyist for the Retail Lumber Dealers Association of Maine.</p>
<p>The bill is currently being considered by the Labor Committee, which may compromise by extending an exemption to businesses below a certain size, determined by number of employees.</p>
<p>If the Maine bill passes, it will be the first state paid sick leave measure on the books.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2010/01/maine-floats-paid-sick-leave-law-businesses-recoil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mandatory Sick Leave an Employer Burden?</title>
		<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2009/02/mandatory-sick-leave-an-employer-burden/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2009/02/mandatory-sick-leave-an-employer-burden/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary McCarty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maternity leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid sick leave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid time off]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/?p=129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Businesses in Milwaukee are fighting a referendum that mandates up to nine days of paid sick leave for all employees working within the city. Voters overwhelmingly approved the referendum this past November, but last week a coalition of business owners got a court to slap a restraining order on its implementation. The measure will be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Businesses in Milwaukee are fighting a referendum that mandates up to nine days of paid sick leave for all employees working within the city. Voters overwhelmingly approved the referendum this past November, but last week a coalition of business owners got a court to slap a restraining order on its implementation. The measure will be debated in the court in detail beginning in May.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the &#8220;Agenda&#8221; section of WhiteHouse.gov says that &#8220;Barack Obama and Joe Biden will require that employers provide seven paid sick days per year.â€ That&#8217;s a pretty clear signal.</p>
<p>Change like this&#8211;the government&#8217;s mandating employers to provide paid sick leave&#8211;may take awhile to implement given the worrisome nature of the economy, but my guess is that it won&#8217;t be long before paid leave is the law of the land.</p>
<p>The thought may freak out some business owners, but a survey of world policy toward paid leave shows that the U.S. is way, way, way behind most nations of the world, even ones where one might attach the &#8220;third world&#8221; moniker.</p>
<p>Take the issue of maternity/paternity leave, the paid variety. Gabon offers 14 weeks of 100-percent-of-salary paid leave to the mother, with job protection. Mexico offers 12 weeks at 100 percent, Peru 90 days at full salary. China tenders 90 days at 100 percent, but Japan&#8211;the world&#8217;s second largest economy behind ours&#8211;offers 14 weeks but at just 60 percent of wages.</p>
<p>Take a trip across the pond to our neighbors in Europe, and you&#8217;ll find some really generous packages: All working parents in Sweden are entitled to 16 months paid leave per child, the cost being shared between employer and state. France has a sliding scale starting at 14 weeks and rising in length as the number of children in the family increases.</p>
<p>Five countries in the world do not offer some form of paid parental leave: Australia, the United States, Liberia, Swaziland, and Papua New Guinea. However, most employees in Australia are entitled to at least 12 monthsâ€™ unpaid leave for the primary caregiver, and new parents are able to receive a Baby Bonus of A$5000.</p>
<p>At least no one in Washington is proposing Sweden-like benefits. Yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2009/02/mandatory-sick-leave-an-employer-burden/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paid Sick Leave: The Next Mandate?</title>
		<link>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2008/12/paid-sick-leave-the-next-mandate/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2008/12/paid-sick-leave-the-next-mandate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 14:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Gary McCarty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Federal Labor Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor law mandates]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paid sick leave]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/?p=36</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[President-elect Obama campaigned on a pledge to mandate paid sick leave at all places of work. Here&#8217;s how the president-elect&#8217;s Web site (Change.Gov) explained this: Half of all private sector workers have no paid sick days and the problem is worse for employees in low-paying jobs, where less than a quarter receive any paid sick [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>President-elect Obama campaigned on a pledge to mandate paid sick leave at all places of work.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how the president-elect&#8217;s Web site (<a title="The Obama-Biden official change Web site" href="http://www.change.gov" target="_blank">Change.Gov</a>) explained this:</p>
<blockquote><p>Half of all private sector workers have no paid sick days and the problem is worse for employees in low-paying jobs, where less than a quarter receive any paid sick days. Barack Obama and Joe Biden will require that employers provide seven paid sick days per year.</p></blockquote>
<p>I believe sick leave is an essential component of the workplace, but I can also see how a small business might suffer if it had to add additional expenses, such as hiring a temp when someone calls in sick.</p>
<p>Either way, there&#8217;s an <a title="debate on paid sick leave" href="http://www.businessweek.com/debateroom/archives/2008/12/make_paid_sick.html" target="_blank">interesting pro-and-con (and neutral) debate</a> over at <em>Business Week</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.personnelconcepts.com/2008/12/paid-sick-leave-the-next-mandate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

