Supreme Court Limits Presidential Appointment Powers

The Supreme Court this week curtailed the appointment power of presidents by ruling that no one can be named as an acting head of a federal agency if that person has been nominated for the full position and that position requires Senate approval.

The ruling springs from an action by then-President Barack Obama, who in 2011 named Lafe Solomon as acting general counsel of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), while he also nominated him for the full post, which required Senate confirmation.

The ruling, written by Chief Justice John Roberts, is based on the Federal Vacancies Reform Act of 1998. The vote was 6-2, with a dissent by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, who argued that since that law was enacted, more than 100 persons have filled acting agency roles while awaiting confirmation for permanent jobs.

The case was National Labor Relations Board v. SW General Inc.


NOTE: The details in this blog are provided for informational purposes only. All answers are general in nature and do not constitute legal advice. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. The author specifically disclaims any and all liability arising directly or indirectly from the reliance on or use of this blog.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Comments (required)*