OMB Mulling Reversion of EEO-1 Pay Data Rule

A petition by the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to review and possibly reverse the EEO-1 pay data mandate by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), which takes effect on March 31, 2018, is under consideration by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), with no certain outlook. Meanwhile, acting EEOC chair Victoria Lipnic seems mostly against the new rule.

The pay data rule requires companies with 100 or more employees to report summary pay data categorized by employees’ gender, race and ethnicity on the EEO-1 form required yearly.

The Chamber of Commerce and 27 trade associations in February asked the Office of Management and Budget to reconsider its 2016 approval of the revised EEO-1 form under the Paperwork Reduction Act.

Lipnic, a Republican, voted against the new pay data requirement, and speaking March 30 at the American Bar Association’s National Conference on Equal Employment Opportunity Law, she expressed doubts that the rule’s results will outweigh its costs.

“To say I’m dubious of the time estimates [of preparing the data] would be an understatement,” Lipnic said, suggesting the cost of complying might be too great.


NOTE: The details in this blog are provided for informational purposes only. All answers are general in nature and do not constitute legal advice. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. The author specifically disclaims any and all liability arising directly or indirectly from the reliance on or use of this blog.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Comments (required)*