DOL Revives Practice of Issuing FLSA Opinion Letters

In early January, the Department of Labor (DOL) reissued 17 opinion letters that the Obama DOL had quashed in favor of issuing broadly applicable “Administrator’s Interpretations,” two of which have now been rescinded by the Trump DOL.

dol-reissues-flsa-opinion-lettersThe 17 opinion letters regarding wage and hour issues were promulgated in the late days of the Bush administration in 2009, but because they had never been sent to the firms seeking the DOL’s opinion, the Obama DOL simply dropped them in favor of “further review.”

This background may sound a bit convoluted, but the main point is that the new DOL under Secretary Alexander Acosta will again be answering inquiries by businesses with wage and hour questions. In addition, the 17 revived documents will now have weight in court under terms of the Portal-to-Portal Act regarding provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).

The Portal-to-Portal Act of 1947 amended the FLSA to provide an employer with an affirmative legal defense that protects it from liability when the employer takes a certain action in reliance upon any written regulation, ruling, or interpretation by the DOL and its Wage and Hour Division (WHD).

Some of the topics of the revived letters include “Year-end non-discretionary bonus and section 7(e) [of the FLSA],” “Calculation of salary deductions and section 13(a)(1) salary basis,” “Salary deductions for full-day absences based on hours missed and section 13(a)(1) salary basis,” and so on. The topics can be quite specific in terms of both the situations in question and the relevant section of the FLSA.

Each opinion letter comes with a promulgating letter signed by WHD Acting Administrator Bryan L. Jarrett, which states that the document “is an official statement of WHD policy and an official ruling for purposes of the Portal-to-Portal Act, 29 U.S.C. “


NOTE: The details in this blog are provided for informational purposes only. All answers are general in nature and do not constitute legal advice. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. The author specifically disclaims any and all liability arising directly or indirectly from the reliance on or use of this blog.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Comments (required)*