With Joint Employer Cases Pending, McDonald’s Settles with Franchisee Employees

For the first time, McDonald’s has ceased fighting a joint employer legal action and agreed to a $3.75 million settlement with franchisee employees over a wage dispute.

The burger corporation was facing a lawsuit in San Francisco and a battle with the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) over the issue of whether it was a joint employer responsible for the actions of its franchisees, but it blinked. Now some 800 McDonald’s workers in San Francisco will split $1.75 million, while the lawyers arguing their case will pocket $2 million.

The San Francisco area workers alleged in their lawsuit that they believed they worked for the head corporation because their paychecks and uniforms all bore the McDonald’s logo.

Still pending is another wage lawsuit filed by 1,200 employees, also in San Francisco, where a federal judge is expected to rule on the suit’s class action status in December.

In the past few years, McDonald’s has beat back similar joint employer legal actions. Being a joint employer means the corporate franchisers would be responsible jointly with the franchisees for legal issues.

NOTE: The details in this blog are provided for informational purposes only. All answers are general in nature and do not constitute legal advice. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. The author specifically disclaims any and all liability arising directly or indirectly from the reliance on or use of this blog.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

* Copy This Password *

* Type Or Paste Password Here *

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Comments (required)*